Help before suspicion.
If the internet drops or a device check fails, start with clear procedural guidance. Technical difficulty shouldn't automatically become an integrity allegation.
A MORE CONSIDERED EXAM DAY
Exams should test knowledge.
Not patience.
An online exam is difficult enough without confusing instructions or an unexplained technical interruption. We're building Proctor to support candidates through those moments, and give institutions a clearer picture of what happened.
A project by Komplyint, part of the ObumAI ecosystem.
Preparing for private institutional evaluation.
PROCTOR / STUDY NO. 01NOTES ON AN EXAM DAY
P / WORKING NOTE01 — 03
When something
goes wrong,
what happens next?
goes wrong,
what happens next?
01Explain the problem
02Help the candidate
03Record & review
Ask what happened.
Don't assume why.
HUMAN JUDGMENT IS ESSENTIAL.
THE IDEA IS SIMPLE
Fair examination needs reliable systems and room for human judgment. Both matter.
01 — THE APPROACH
Designed around the person taking the exam.
A strong process doesn't have to feel adversarial. Proctor's intended role is deliberately practical: explain, document and escalate — never judge a candidate on its own.
Keep a useful record.
Versioned rules and signed events are being developed so reviewers can understand which events were received and why an exception was raised.
Leave decisions to people.
Authorized staff evaluate the context. An automated prompt or flag is not a misconduct finding, grade or failure decision.
A PRINCIPLE WE WON'T TRADE AWAY
A technical interruption is not a verdict.
02 — THE EXAM DAY
Three moments worth getting right.
From preparing the device to resolving an incident afterward, these are the workflows we're developing and verifying with independent tests.
Before
Clear expectations, approved identity and accessible checks that help candidates get ready.
During
Plain-language technical guidance with human escalation when a situation needs one.
After
Reviewable, privacy-conscious evidence for institutionally authorized decision-makers.
03 — WHERE THINGS STAND
Useful work, done carefully.
Proctor is a product in development. Our public website is here to explain the approach, not to suggest a live examination service is available.
No public candidate or staff sign-in is available. Exam sessions will remain closed until independent identity, security, privacy and institutional requirements have been met.
FOUNDATION
Core systems built
Control-plane, policy, event and candidate-support components are in source review and testing.
IN PROGRESS
Private verification
Identity, deployment isolation, compatibility, operational safeguards and test evidence remain open.
NOT YET OPEN
Institutional pilot
A controlled evaluation will follow only after the responsible institution has approved it.
AN OBUMAI TOOL. A DISTINCT RESPONSIBILITY.